Saturday, July 3, 2010

Lcd Tv Usb External Hdd

Electroingeniería and participate in Chihuidos Cristóbal López I with premiums of $ S 1,200 million

28/06 - 11:00 - A group of MPs made a court filing in the courts Comodoro Py against Neuquén authorities for irregularities in the formation of the joint venture that will be responsible for the construction of the work I Chihuidos. 20% of the package have two companies of the presidential entourage, suspected of being linked to Néstor Kirchner Electroingeniería one hand and Commercial Construction of Christopher Lee Silver

on the other. Will it happen something similar to Condor Cliff, the canyon in Santa Cruz?.
Members Juan Carlos Morán, Fernando Reyes, Walter Adrián Pérez and Martello, made a court filing in the courts of Comodoro Py claiming that I Chiu energy project in the province of Neuquén be made with a premium of U.S. $ S 1,200 million and which have a stake in two joint venture companies government such as kidney Electroingeniería (EISA), whose director is Gerald Ferreira Construction Comercial del Plata and Christopher Lee, said today the Black River Journal. The complaint lawmakers admit that they have complied with the procedures for selection in this type of work or taken into account the principles of public procurement. At this point Roggio notes that the group had submitted a bid for $ 303 million (1,200 unless EISA-CPC) lost because the total financing of the work has not reached 30% at a cheap rate for the system. Easy: make state-backed private.
As regards the Black River tandem EISA-CPC submitted its proposal to build Chihuido I, a funding of around U.S. $ 1.181 million for a total construction cost in excess of 1,560 million dollars. Under the proposals released publicly, there are three financial institutions that participate in the provision of funds: the Bank of Cordoba, with $ 302 million, the Bank would bring another 150 million Macro and National Development Bank (BNDES) would be able to transfer 729 million dollars. But, looking at the "fine print" of the proposal, it appears that the funding of the work is not private but is brought to you by the entities referred to security guarantees and national and provincial levels, the latter through collaborative resource assignment. In short, who takes credit for the work ends up being the nation state and the banks mentioned, which are getting funding, acting as mere intermediaries in the structuring of the financial supply chain to start the work. The questions arise from this pose and lawmakers say, are the following:
• What is the business risk when funding for the work come from banks with government guarantees?
• Is not an argument, at least not serious to as the winner of the certifying this proposed increased funding?


MEPs consider that there would be a move in this contract under which benefits the consortium pre-granted by the national State aid, which allows you to get funding without which it would be impossible to access on an equal footing with other bidders , a relatively "normal" in public works in the province of Santa Cruz where everything goes into the hands of the companies marked by his relationship with Néstor Kirchner.

The investment recovery La construcción de la obra Chiuido
Here too There are many doubts. The complaint raised to Comodoro Py said that the cost of future energy to charge for the consortium's pre-granted MW / month $ 7.355 higher than the second pre-qualified. This difference will end, presumably, be transferred to the final consumer price. users with pre-award the consortium led by EISA-CPC, must pay a premium equivalent to 1,100 million dollars for the entire concession period, which would be equivalent to the cost of investment required to implement the project Chihuido II. Contributions Anses The complaint filed in Comodoro Py said that the argument del gobierno neuquino del financiamiento privado que permitió adjudicar la obra a un mayor precio que las restantes ofertas es una falacia debido a que «los 1.180 millones de dólares de supuesto financiamiento privado de estos empresarios están directamente respaldados por fideicomisos, seguros, coparticipación federal y hasta posibles cargos energéticos a crearse por parte del Estado nacional».

En otra parte del escrito destacan que «los empresarios no ponen un peso, por lo que ellos no asumen riesgo de ningún tipo, sino que es asumido en su totalidad por el Estado nacional, por ende, quien responde en última instancia es siempre el pueblo argentino».

En otro de los párrafos de la denuncia se destaca que «de todo lo expuesto es importante remarcar que además del sobreprecio en favor de EISA-CPC y el riesgo exclusivo del Estado en los créditos otorgados, lo escandaloso es que indirectamente estarían financiando un presunto hecho de corrupción con dinero de los futuros jubilados».

Los diputados que impulsan la demanda dan cuenta de las actas de la Anses, en las que se observa que tanto el Banco Macro como el de Córdoba reciben permanentemente grandes depósitos del Fondo de Garantías de Sustentabilidad del Sistema Integrado Previsional Argentino, termina señalando el diario Río Negro.

Santa Cruz está a las puertas de generar una inversión similar a through the construction of Condor Cliff-The Barrancosa; be seen whether the allocation of work will be transparent and as usual, will be a boon to companies in the power that stained all the good that can be suspected of extra work and corruption. OPI Agency Santa Cruz).

Posted by admin at 7:22 PM

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)